SKILLEMALL.ai

AC question-generator

AI智能出题系统。根据知识点、学习材料或主题,生成10种题型(单选/多选/判断/填空/简答/论述/计算/应用/匹配/案例分析)的多层次试题,基于Bloom分类法标注认知层次,附答案与详细解析,输出交互式HTML试卷。覆盖K12至高等教育及职业培训全场景。触发词:出题, 生成题目, 生成试题, 出几道题, 组卷, 试卷生成, 练习题, 测试题, 考试题, quiz, 生成测验, 题库, make exam, generate questions, question generator, 出一套题, 模拟试卷, 随堂测试, 单元测试, 期末试卷, 练习卷

ClawHub Agent Skills author: bettermen v1.0.1 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 976 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

AI智能出题系统。根据知识点、学习材料或主题,生成10种题型(单选/多选/判断/填空/简答/论述/计算/应用/匹配/案例分析)的多层次试题,基于Bloom分类法标注认知层次,附答案与详细解析,输出交互式HTML试卷。覆盖K12至高等教育及职业培训全场景。触发词:出题, 生成题目, 生成试题, 出几道题, 组卷…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorLearningSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 38 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 976 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 278: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a legitimate quiz generator, but it needs Review because it runs a local script, writes an HTML file, and handles quiz data in ways that could become unsafe with untrusted input.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 5 Jul 2026