SKILLEMALL.ai

BD saas-decision

SaaS产品辅助决策助手。用户输入SaaS产品行业与定位,自动从市场需求、用户画像、需求痛点、竞品格局、变现定价(MRR/ARR/LTV)、获客增长(CAC/PLG)、推广营销、成本结构、技术可行性9大维度进行综合分析,生成专业交互式HTML可行性决策报告。涵盖SaaS定价模型对比、MRR预估、LTV/CAC分析、多租户架构选型等SaaS专属议题。触发词:SaaS决策, SaaS可行性, SaaS评估, SaaS能不能做, 开发SaaS, SaaS分析报告, SaaS调研, 软件即服务决策, saas decision, SaaS选型, SaaS创业评估, 做SaaS产品。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: bettermen v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 009 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

SaaS产品辅助决策助手。用户输入SaaS产品行业与定位,自动从市场需求、用户画像、需求痛点、竞品格局、变现定价(MRR/ARR/LTV)、获客增长(CAC/PLG)、推广营销、成本结构、技术可行性9大维度进行综合分析,生成专业交互式HTML可行性决策报告。涵盖SaaS定价模型对比、MRR预估、LTV/CAC分析、多…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 47 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1009 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 290: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The skill is a coherent SaaS research-and-report generator that uses web research and local HTML output without hidden persistence or credential access.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Jun 2026