AC ta-chart-basics
当用户需要读懂或亲手绘制金融/期货图表、选择时间尺度（日/周/月/日内）、区分线图/点数图/单线图、 或在算术刻度与对数刻度之间做选择、理解交易量/持仓兴趣如何在图上呈现时激活。 不适用于：已会读图只想做买卖决策（转 trend-tools / 形态类 skill）、纯基本面分析。 关键 trigger 词：怎么看K线/图表、蜡烛图、十字星、K线形态、日线周线月线、算术刻度对数刻度、如何作图。 Activate when the user needs to read or draw financial/futures charts, choose time scale (daily/weekly/monthly/intraday), distinguish line/P&F/single-line charts, choose between arithmetic and logarithmic scales, or understand how volume/open-interest appear on charts. Not applicable: already able to read charts and only wants buy/sell decisions (-> trend-tools / pattern skills), pure fundamental analysis. Key trigger words: how to read candlestick/chart, candlestick, doji, K-line pattern, daily/weekly/monthly, arithmetic/log scale, how to plot.
当用户需要读懂或亲手绘制金融/期货图表、选择时间尺度（日/周/月/日内）、区分线图/点数图/单线图、 或在算术刻度与对数刻度之间做选择、理解交易量/持仓兴趣如何在图上呈现时激活。 不适用于：已会读图只想做买卖决策（转 trend-tools / 形态类 skill）、纯基本面分析。 关键 trigger…
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_book" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_chapter" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "related_skills"
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 42 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 600 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 751: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.