SKILLEMALL.ai

AF ethical-acquisition

Turn a confirmed Offer Brief and Payable Test Plan into a small, policy-compliant acquisition plan with staged human-reviewed assets and a specific approval checkpoint. Use before outreach, a listing, a partnership request, public content, or any buyer-facing acquisition action.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: bilbop1 v1.0.1 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 861 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 23 h ago

Turn a confirmed Offer Brief and Payable Test Plan into a small, policy-compliant acquisition plan with staged human-reviewed assets and a specific approval…

As a process F 55/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/approval-gates.md

ProcedureSales and CRMCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
55/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/approval-gates.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/approval-gates.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/approval-gates.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/approval-gates.md
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 12 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1861 tokens
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 279: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed planning-and-drafting workflow for ethical acquisition outreach, with external actions gated on specific human approval.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 20 Jul 2026