SKILLEMALL.ai

AA moneyprinter

Use when the user asks how to make money, monetize existing work, grow revenue, choose among projects, find a first customer, improve a cash engine, or invoke MoneyPrinter.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: bilbop1 v1.0.1 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 2 356 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Use when the user asks how to make money, monetize existing work, grow revenue, choose among projects, find a first customer, improve a cash engine, or invoke…

As a process A 84/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentsMarketingFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
A
84/100
Runs to the end
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 84/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2356 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low The skill ranks results itself: that belongs to the system behind the tool, not the model

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 172: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is coherent and not malicious, but it asks an agent to broadly inspect recent local AI session histories, which is sensitive enough that users should review the scope before installing.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 20 Jul 2026