SKILLEMALL.ai

BC viral-content-expert

爆款二创超级专家:聚焦抖音、视频号、小红书三大平台的二创内容全流程创作,包含热点追踪、爆点挖掘、多平台二创脚本/文案创作、UC式标题优化、PRD适配、可视化呈现,输出可直接落地的爆款二创内容。触发关键词:二创、爆款、抖音脚本、视频号文案、小红书文案、热点追踪、短视频脚本、口播脚本、爆点挖掘、viral content、secondary creation、content repurposing

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Bill-666code v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 250 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 139 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1250 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 198: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 31 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 139 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This content-generation skill is coherent overall, but it explicitly allows unattended scheduled generation and persistence-related actions without clear user approval controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026