AC google-search-console-cli
Google Search Console data analysis and site management via google-search-console-cli. Use when the user wants to check search performance, analyze queries, inspect URL index status, manage sitemaps, or view site properties. Triggers: "Search Console", "search performance", "search queries", "GSC", "index status", "URL inspection", "sitemap", "search analytics", "impressions", "CTR", "search appearance".
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (google-search-console-cli) differs from the folder (google-search-console-open-cli)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4017 tokens
- 100Steps. 50 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 407: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 48 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 50 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (35 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.