AC crypto-market-rank
Crypto market leaderboards — ranked aggregate feeds across the whole market: social-hype/sentiment rank, trending / top-search / Binance Alpha / tokenized-stocks rank, smart-money net-inflow rank (which tokens received the most inflow), top meme tokens by breakout score on Pulse launchpad, top trader PnL leaderboard (ALL / KOL). Use whenever the user wants a ranked list of tokens or addresses by some metric — phrases like "trending tokens", "top N by hype", "leaderboard", "rank by X", "biggest inflows", "top traders this week".
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (crypto-market-rank) differs from the folder (binance-web3-crypto-market-rank)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 22 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1420 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 533: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.