SKILLEMALL.ai

BD getnote-knowledge-master

Get笔记 · 六步抄作业版。复刻 AI 大神卡帕西的知识管理方法论,融合 Get笔记 API + @getnote/cli 实现一键式六步知识管理流程。 **何时激活:** (1) 用户提到"六步抄作业"、"卡帕西知识管理"、"知识库抄作业" (2) 用户要执行完整知识管理流程(建库→存入→整理→搜索→反哺→体检) (3) 用户一句话触发多步骤知识管理操作,如"帮我把最近AI进展整理一下存到知识库" (4) 用户提到"Get笔记升级版"、"知识沉淀"、"知识复利" (5) 常规 Get笔记 操作(保存/搜索/知识库/标签)但带有工作流意味(批量、自动化、定期) **默认主阵地:"得到"知识库(topic_id: `eYzMmvnm`)** 张公子的主要工作环境在此知识库,六步法的所有操作默认以此为上下文,除非用户明确指定其他知识库。 本 Skill 基于 Get笔记 API + @getnote/cli,通过 orchestrated 多步骤流程实现六步法。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: binhuatochina v1.1.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 487 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1487 tokens
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 439: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +4Has examples (22 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This note-management skill is not plainly malicious, but it can scan broad private notes, save or delete content, and publish summaries to Feishu without clear enough per-action consent.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026