SKILLEMALL.ai

BC fec-component-testing

Use when authoring or reviewing frontend unit, component, or light integration tests close to UI code, including React Testing Library, Vue Test Utils, hooks/composables, props/emits, callbacks, accessible queries, user-event interactions, mocks, loading/error/empty states, and regression coverage. For layer planning, real-browser journeys, or existing validation failures, choose the matching testing or validation workflow first; Chinese triggers include component testing, Component unit testing, unit testing, lightweight integration testing.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Bovin Phang v2.9.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 204 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 11 d ago

Use when authoring or reviewing frontend unit, component, or light integration tests close to UI code, including React Testing Library, Vue Test Utils…

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 24 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1204 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 548: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a straightforward frontend testing guidance skill with no hidden persistence, credential use, or unsafe behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 26 Sept 2026