SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CF remotion-bozo

快速创建 Remotion 视频项目的技能。提供完整的项目模板、动画工具函数、渲染脚本和最佳实践。一键创建专业视频项目。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: bozoyan v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files · 1 script body ≈ 626 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

快速创建 Remotion 视频项目的技能。提供完整的项目模板、动画工具函数、渲染脚本和最佳实践。一键创建专业视频项目。

As a process F 33/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../remotion-best-practices, ../remotion-video-toolkit

ProcedurePlaywrightSoftware developmentMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
No process to follow
References files that are not bundled: ../remotion-best-practices, ../remotion-video-toolkit
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../remotion-best-practices
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../remotion-video-toolkit

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../remotion-best-practices, ../remotion-video-toolkit
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../remotion-best-practices, ../remotion-video-toolkit
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 35 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 626 tokens
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 60: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This Remotion video scaffolding skill is mostly coherent, but it needs review because it can write project files outside the intended folder and its AWS Lambda rendering guidance is under-scoped for credentials and deletion actions.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 12 Sept 2026