SKILLEMALL.ai

AC intercept-sdr

Control and query the iNTERCEPT SDR signal intelligence platform via its REST API. Use when the user wants to check SDR device status, start/stop signal decoders (ADS-B, ACARS, POCSAG pager, rtl_433, weather satellites, APRS, AIS, SSTV, VDL2, DSC, Morse code, sub-GHz, TSCM sweeps, drone detection, WiFi/BT scanning, GPS, Meshtastic, space weather), retrieve decoded messages, check system health, manage recordings, view satellite passes, or perform any SDR/SIGINT operation through iNTERCEPT. Also use for starting/stopping/listening to audio streams, managing the frequency scanner, controlling remote agents, and checking dependencies.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Brandon Graves v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 3 457 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Control and query the iNTERCEPT SDR signal intelligence platform via its REST API.

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 6 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3457 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 639: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 39 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
    • +4Has examples (34 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a disclosed SDR control integration, but it grants broad live monitoring and process-control authority without enough scoping or safety guidance.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · 28 May 2026