AD dingtalk-calendar
钉钉日程与日历。当用户提到"钉钉日程"、"日历"、"创建日程"、"新建会议"、"视频会议"、"钉钉会议"、"会议室"、"约会议室"、"会议室忙闲"、"空闲会议室"、"签到"、"签退"、"签到链接"、"签退链接"、"循环日程"、"重复日程"、"recurrence"、"查日程"、"日程列表"、"修改日程"、"删除日程"、"闲忙"、"忙闲"、"querySchedule"、"calendar"、"dingtalk schedule"、"日程提醒"时使用此技能。支持:主日历下日程 CRUD、用户闲忙、视频会议、会议室忙闲与绑定日程、签到/签退与链接、循环规则(recurrence);订阅公共日历等需 Calendar.Calendar.Write 的能力见 api.md。
As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Exfiltration
exfil-secret-in-urlscripts/dt_helper.sh:196Credential passed in a URL query string (normal for some APIs — verify the host is the intended service) (placeholder value)resp=$(curl -s "https://oapi.dingtalk.com/gettoken?appkey=…&appsecret=…")
placeholder -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usescripts/dt_helper.sh:196Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)resp=$(curl -s "https://oapi.dingtalk.com/gettoken?appkey=…&appsecret=…")
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
exfil-secret-in-urlscripts/dt_helper.sh:229Credential passed in a URL query string (normal for some APIs — verify the host is the intended service) (placeholder value)"https://oapi.dingtalk.com/topapi/v2/user/get?access_token=…" \
placeholder -
low Exfiltration
exfil-secret-in-urlscripts/dt_helper.sh:262Credential passed in a URL query string (normal for some APIs — verify the host is the intended service) (placeholder value)"https://oapi.dingtalk.com/topapi/user/getbyunionid?access_token=…" \
placeholder
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (dingtalk-calendar) differs from the folder (dingtalk-calendar-only-curl)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 13 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 953 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 337: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.