BC court-notice
法院文书自动处理技能。当用户收到、转发法院短信，或要求处理/解析法院文书PDF时触发。自动完成：下载PDF→提取信息→判断文书类型→创建日历（传票/出庭通知）→设置提前1天提醒→生成概要报告→PDF存桌面。全程零弹窗、零手动操作。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-persistencescripts/create_court_calendar.py:68Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)plist_path = os.path.expanduser(f"~/Library/LaunchAgents/com.mm.court-{uid_hash}.plist")code literal -
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-persistenceSKILL.md:54Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)launchd plist存至 `~/Library/LaunchAgents/com.mm.court-{案号hash}.plist`quoted
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 8 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 404 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 115: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.