SKILLEMALL.ai

AC agent-coordination

This skill should be used when the user asks about "coordinate coding agents", "orchestrate agent team", "manage multiple agents", "vibekanban workflow", "task delegation to agents", "agent swarm coordination", "parallel agent execution", "chief of staff mode", "cos mode", "you're my cos", "your my cos", "act as cos", "be my cos", "you are my chief of staff", "create tasks for agents", "dispatch agents", or needs guidance on coordinating autonomous coding agents, task breakdown strategies, or multi-agent workflow patterns.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Brian Wagner v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 176 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 33 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1176 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 16 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 528: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 26 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This looks like a real agent-coordination skill, but it gives broad persistent authority and includes an unsafe hard-coded local autonomy exception that needs review before use.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026