SKILLEMALL.ai

AC vettr

Static analysis security scanner for third-party OpenClaw skills. Detects eval/spawn risks, malicious dependencies, typosquatting, and prompt injection patterns before installation. Use when vetting skills from ClawHub or untrusted sources.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Britrik v2.0.4 MIT-0 18 files body ≈ 1 348 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Static analysis security scanner for third-party OpenClaw skills.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

AnalyzerSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:61
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
      "integrity": "sha512-/bRZt…IFY/xU5H…Jej+RnxB…LOR+5hX7…S8A==",
      detector
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token package-lock.json:170
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
      "integrity": "sha5…wQp+7C4n…9JQ==",
      detector

    Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 21 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1348 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 240: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a coherent third-party skill scanner; its higher-risk behaviors are disclosed and tied to user-directed vetting actions.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 2 Jun 2026