SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC google-scholar-research-scraper-agent-built-api-skill

This skill helps users run the Google Scholar Research Scraper Bot BrowserAct template and extract structured public data. Use this skill when users ask to collect google scholar research scraper bot data, scrape google scholar research scraper bot results, export public records, enrich datasets, monitor public web data, or call this BrowserAct template by API.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: browser-act skill v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 013 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

This skill helps users run the Google Scholar Research Scraper Bot BrowserAct template and extract structured public data.

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

IntegrationInfrastructureData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 40 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1013 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 363: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill mostly does what it advertises, but its Google Scholar scraper scope is broadened to public-data collection and contact details without enough limits or privacy guidance.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Sept 2026