BF walmart-product-reviews
Walmart product reviews scraper: given a walmart.com product item ID, navigate to the reviews page and extract paginated customer reviews including reviewId, rating, title, review text, author nickname, submission date, verified purchase status, helpful votes, variant selected (color/size), badges, fulfilled by, seller name, and photo count. Use when user mentions walmart reviews, walmart product reviews, walmart customer reviews, scrape walmart reviews, extract walmart reviews, walmart review scraper, walmart ratings and reviews, walmart review data, walmart review text, walmart review pagination, get reviews from walmart, walmart review collector, walmart verified purchase reviews, walmart review analysis, walmart sentiment analysis, walmart review export, walmart buyer feedback. Also applies to bulk collection of walmart product reviews across multiple items, sentiment analysis on walmart reviews for market research, competitor product review benchmarking on walmart, and monitoring new walmart reviews over time.
Walmart product reviews scraper: given a walmart.com product item ID, navigate to the reviews page and extract paginated customer reviews including reviewId…
As a process F 54/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/*.py
How to improve
- Shorten the description to 1024 characters.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
description-longdescription is 1030 chars, limit 1024 - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/*.py
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/*.py
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 15 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1488 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 1030: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 50.