BB x-tweet-by-conversation
Collects every tweet in an X (Twitter) conversation thread given a conversation id (root tweet id) — the focal tweet plus all replies, sub-replies, and quote chains — and returns normalized per-tweet data with text, author, engagement counts, media, hashtags, mentions, in_reply_to mapping, and cursor for pagination. Use when user mentions Twitter conversation, X conversation thread, conversation_id, thread scraper, scrape Twitter replies, all replies to a tweet, replies under a tweet, sub-replies, nested replies, thread harvester, get replies of a tweet, scrape comments on Twitter, scrape comments on X, full thread extraction, conversation export, conversation tree, reply chain, thread dump, X tweet thread, twitter thread scrape, comment scraping twitter, comment scraping x, focal tweet plus context, root tweet plus replies. Also applies to sentiment analysis on a single viral tweet, controversy mapping, harvesting community Q&A threads, capturing AMA threads, recovering long-running discussions, and any paginated bulk reply collection driven by a conversation id.
Collects every tweet in an X (Twitter) conversation thread given a conversation id (root tweet id) — the focal tweet plus all replies, sub-replies, and quote…
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Shorten the description to 1024 characters.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
description-longdescription is 1080 chars, limit 1024
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 36 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2505 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 1080: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.