SKILLEMALL.ai

BC agent-wormhole

Use Agent Wormhole for one-time sealed handoffs between autonomous agents, including encrypted mission briefs, scoped secrets, temporary artifacts, receipts, config drops, CLI/API usage, ECHO holder access, and Bankr x402 paid opens.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: BuiltByEcho v0.1.2 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 788 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 11 d ago

Use Agent Wormhole for one-time sealed handoffs between autonomous agents, including encrypted mission briefs, scoped secrets, temporary artifacts, receipts…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 89): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 788 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 233: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is coherent, but it asks users to run an unpinned external npm package for workflows involving secrets, files, and paid wallet-backed opens.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026