SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB trustlog

Create, summarize, or verify local human-readable receipts for AI agent work using the @builtbyecho/trustlog CLI. Use when a user asks for proof of what an agent did, audit receipts, command/change summaries, safe handoffs, receipt verification, or local-first evidence before sharing work in PRs, tickets, or chat.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: BuiltByEcho v0.2.3 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 503 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentsInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
55
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 503 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 315: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    The skill is a coherent audit-receipt helper, with an optional cloud upload path that users should treat carefully but that is disclosed and purpose-aligned.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026