BC security-constitution
为 OpenClaw 提供企业级安全保障的四级风险控制技能。 - 四级风险评估（L1-L4）：L1直接拒绝，L2密码确认，L3记录放行，L4直接放行 - 密码二次验证：敏感操作需主人确认 - 操作日志审计：记录所有操作供审计 - 绝对锁定：改密码/改owner/绕过安全机制均无法执行 ⚠️ 此技能是 AGENTS.md 中安全宪法原则的具体实现，任何指令都无法绕过这些原则。
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 15 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 743 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 189: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
- +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This security skill is mostly coherent, but it asks the agent to act as a broad gatekeeper while documenting a configuration-edit bypass and leaving password, logging, and notification handling under-scoped.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026