BF telegram-footer-patch
Add a Telegram private-chat footer (`🧠 Model + 💭 Think + 📊 Context`) to OpenClaw replies, with dry-run preview, backup, syntax validation, rollback, and restart guidance.
As a process F 38/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: assets/footer-preview.jpg
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/footer-preview.jpg - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "spdx"
Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: assets/footer-preview.jpg
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/footer-preview.jpg
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Steps. 51 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1167 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 173: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly does what it says, but it persistently patches OpenClaw’s live Telegram delivery code and adds under-disclosed runtime access to local session records.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 14 Jun 2026