AC investment-research
Perform structured investment research (投研分析) for a company/stock/ETF/sector using a repeatable framework: fundamentals (basic/财务报表与商业模式), technical analysis (技术指标与关键价位), industry research (行业景气与竞争格局), valuation (估值对比/情景), catalysts and risks, and produce a professional research report + actionable plan. Use when the user asks for: equity/ETF analysis, earnings/financial statement breakdown, peer/industry comparison, valuation ranges, bull/base/bear scenarios, technical trend/support-resistance, or a full research memo.
Perform structured investment research (投研分析) for a company/stock/ETF/sector using a repeatable framework: fundamentals (basic/财务报表与商业模式), technical analysis…
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Perform structured investment research (投研分析) for a company/stock/… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 46 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 519 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 525: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.