SKILLEMALL.ai

BC devils-advocate

魔鬼代言人 — 反附和批判性评审 Skill。当用户需要方案评审、决策质疑、批判性反馈、红队思考、避免群体思维时使用。触发场景包括:用户在提出方案/想法/决策后需要外部挑战、想听不同意见、需要多视角审查、做重大决策前想要魔鬼代言人把关。自动召唤5个虚拟利益相关方角色进行尖锐质询,输出结构化改进建议。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: YY v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 778 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

魔鬼代言人 — 反附和批判性评审 Skill。当用户需要方案评审、决策质疑、批判性反馈、红队思考、避免群体思维时使用。触发场景包括:用户在提出方案/想法/决策后需要外部挑战、想听不同意见、需要多视角审查、做重大决策前想要魔鬼代言人把关。自动召唤5个虚拟利益相关方角色进行尖锐质询,输出结构化改进建议。

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 36 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 778 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -222 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 150: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a prompt-only critique skill that may be blunt and over-triggered, but it does not request code execution, credentials, files, network access, or persistence.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026