SKILLEMALL.ai

CB openclaw-autodidact

(no description)

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings
ClawHub Agent Skills author: 邢怀康 v1.0.0 11 files body ≈ 1 652 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
64/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
82
Quality 40%
37
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Concealment
If you install

The skill tells the agent to hide things from you: not to show errors, not to mention actions, to report differently from what was done. You lose the ability to see what the agent really did.

For the author

Transparency beats a smooth answer. If the goal is to hide technical noise, ask the agent to "summarise briefly", not to "not mention".

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
  2. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

  • high Concealment en-hide-from-user knowledge/AntiPatterns.md:166
    Instruction to hide actions from the user
    ❌ Bad: Run cycles but never notify user

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "role"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"

Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (openclaw-autodidact) differs from the folder (botlearnb-autodidact)
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 50 steps
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1652 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 50 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 37.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is not clearly malicious, but it needs review because it can repeatedly inspect past sessions, install other skills, and interact with external communities.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026