AB diagnose-openclaw-model-routing-and-fallback-usage
用于分析 OpenClaw 中“某个 provider/模型为什么看起来没被用上”、主模型与 fallback 实际是否生效、以及 ClaudeCodeCLI 协作任务为何中断。遇到这些情况就应触发：用户提到“没请求打到 local-router”“明明注册了模型却没流量”“Agent 到底在用哪个模型”“fallback 有没有发生”“为什么日志里看不到候选切换”“code 143 / SIGTERM / Exec failed”“需要结合当前配置和日志做严谨归因”。也适用于区分“provider 被调用”与“provider 下某个特定模型被调用”这两类常见混淆。
As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers
How to improve
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 64 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2326 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium 4 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -218 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 10 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 287: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 64 items
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.