AC discord-thread-naming-backstop-workflow
用于执行 Discord 线程命名兜底（backstop）巡检与改名，专门处理某个 guild 下指定 parent channel 中“最近新建但未命名规范”的线程，补上 prehook 漏网，而不是批量回扫历史。遇到“线程重命名兜底”“dispatch 线程命名规范”“只检查最近 20 分钟线程”“JSON 污染标题”“长标题截断”“按规则静默改名或告警”“Discord thread-list / channel-edit / channel-info 重试与一致性检查”等场景时就应触发。即使用户没说 backstop，只要意图是低扰动修正新线程标题，也应使用此技能。
As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 67 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1490 tokens
- medium 4 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 290: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 67 items
- +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.