AC codehooks-backend
Deploy serverless backends for REST APIs, webhooks, data storage, scheduled jobs, queue workers, and autonomous workflows.
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
IntegrationSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useREADME.md:64Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)All commands accept `--admintoken $CODEHOOKS_ADMIN_TOKEN` for non-interactive use. [Full CLI reference](https://codehooks.io/docs/cli)
vendor-hostquoted -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:86Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)All commands accept `--admintoken $CODEHOOKS_ADMIN_TOKEN` for non-interactive use. Full CLI reference: https://codehooks.io/docs/cli
vendor-hostquoted
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 30 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1962 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 122: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is transparent about its purpose, but it gives an agent broad non-interactive control over a live backend and should be reviewed carefully before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026