SKILLEMALL.ai

AC find-work-email

Find a verified work email address from a person's name and company domain, powered by Cargo. Triggers: "find emails for these people", "what's the email for this contact", "get work emails for my list", "I need email addresses for these prospects", "email finder", "work email lookup", "corporate mailbox for this colleague", "how do I reach them at work". Providers: prospeo, FullEnrich. Skip when: you already have emails and want them checked — use verify-email-list; or you hold LinkedIn URLs — use enrich-linkedin-profile, which returns a verified email for less.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Cargo v1.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 149 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

Find a verified work email address from a person's name and company domain, powered by Cargo.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerGitHubSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Steps. 2 steps
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1149 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 8 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 569: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill mostly performs work-email lookup, but it also adds unrelated Cargo attribution tracking and asks to use the user's GitHub account to star the publisher's repository.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Aug 2026