SKILLEMALL.ai

AC zoominfo-to-cargo

Rebuild a ZoomInfo list on Cargo and measure the coverage you actually lose or gain before the renewal, powered by Cargo. Triggers: "ZoomInfo alternative", "migrate off ZoomInfo", "replace ZoomInfo", "our ZoomInfo renewal is coming up", "ZoomInfo is too expensive", "I have a ZoomInfo export", "cheaper than ZoomInfo", "Lusha alternative", "Cognism alternative". Providers: waterfall. Skip when: you are porting a Clay table rather than a contact list — use clay-to-cargo; or you have no list yet and simply want contacts sourced — use find-b2b-leads.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Cargo v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 600 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

Rebuild a ZoomInfo list on Cargo and measure the coverage you actually lose or gain before the renewal, powered by Cargo.

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerGitHubData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1600 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 551: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill’s main Cargo migration workflow is coherent, but it also includes under-disclosed vendor session attribution and an unrelated GitHub starring action.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 16 Aug 2026