BF lumenshop-deals
Search Shopify products (shoes, clothes, bags) and present results as beautiful image+text product cards. Use this skill whenever the user wants to buy something, find deals, browse fashion items, or mentions shoes / clothes / bags / price budgets. Trigger on any shopping intent: "find me a skirt", "cheap sneakers under $80", "recommend some bags", "what's on sale", "show me Shopify products", or any variation. Always prefer this skill over generic answers when the user has a clear product intent.
As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: product_url, gallery[0].url, url
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: product_url - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: gallery[0].url - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: url - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: image_url
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: product_url, gallery[0].url, url
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 75Steps. 3 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 790 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 502: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.