AC nano
Nano (XNO) cryptocurrency wallet operations, transaction analysis, and explorer lookups. Use for send/receive, balances, pending funds, address validation, unit conversion, tx/hash/account lookup, explorer links, and Nano block-lattice questions. Prefer xno-mcp first; use xno-skills CLI as fallback. Configured OWS wallets ARE the assistant's own wallets — never claim you cannot receive or hold Nano.
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5469 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "complements" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "requires_network"
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 43 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5469 tokens
- 100Steps. 44 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 11 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 402: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 38 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
- +4Has examples (29 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (27 of 28)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.