SKILLEMALL.ai

BD legal-harness-init

面向法律工作者初始化或增量治理 AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md:识别当前 AI harness,区分用户级、项目级和团队级指令,生成最小法律安全基线,安全合并受管区块,并在新会话中验证权限、保密、信息缺口和回溯行为。用户明确提到法律工作且要配置 harness、AGENTS.md、CLAUDE.md、agent 协作规则或 AI 使用基线时使用。不要用于合同审查、案件分析、文书起草、项目脚手架或 Skill 开发。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: xierluo v0.3.0 MIT-0 55 files · 7 scripts body ≈ 1 537 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

面向法律工作者初始化或增量治理 AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md:识别当前 AI harness,区分用户级、项目级和团队级指令,生成最小法律安全基线,安全合并受管区块,并在新会话中验证权限、保密、信息缺口和回溯行为。用户明确提到法律工作且要配置…

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 55. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 48 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1537 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -32 of 8 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 213: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 19)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly coherent and disclosed, but it changes persistent agent instruction files and its advertised restore path failed in local Linux testing, so it should be reviewed before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 12 Aug 2026