SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC celf-style-writer

Personal Chinese writing-style skill for Cell 细胞 style articles, rewrites, style enhancement, and style review. Use when Codex needs to write, rewrite, enhance, or audit Chinese content so it sounds like Cell speaking directly to the reader: friend-to-friend, warm but sharp, concrete, hook-driven, anti-academic, anti-AI-template, and grounded in real experience instead of abstract sermonizing.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: cellinlab v0.1.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 1 645 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorInfrastructureSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 70 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1645 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 396: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 70 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is an instruction-only Chinese writing-style skill that includes Cell persona details, but it does not execute code, access credentials, use the network, or persist anything.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026