AB token-scan
Scan token contract security risk and return a structured summary including score, tax, holder concentration, and LP lock status. Supported chains are bsc, eth, solana, arbitrum, base, polygon, avax, tron, ton, plasma, and sui. Trigger when the user provides a chain and contract address and asks for token risk analysis, security review, high-risk item identification, tax interpretation, or holder distribution analysis.
As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 41 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 6 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 941 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 422: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.