SKILLEMALL.ai

AC time-machine

Git-style incremental snapshots and instant rollback for OpenClaw. Use when user needs to: (1) Create manual snapshots (save, backup, snapshot, 时光机), (2) List existing backups, (3) Rollback to a previous state, (4) Auto-snapshot before dangerous changes, (5) Configure scheduled backups with retention policies.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: KillShadow v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 955 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Git-style incremental snapshots and instant rollback for OpenClaw.… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 28 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 955 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -31 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 311: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 21 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This backup skill is coherent but needs review because it can copy and persist secrets without showing the promised encryption in code.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026