SKILLEMALL.ai

BC thought-leader-forum

思想领袖论坛 v3.0 · 顶级大佬模拟互动系统 三大核心功能: 1. 【讨论模式】多角色模拟辩论,输出结构化报告 2. 【意见模式】单大佬针对具体问题快速输出观点 3. 【参会模式】大佬实时参与会议,发表意见和提问 ⚠️ 法律合规声明:所有输出均明确标注【观点模拟:XXX人物名】, 仅代表基于公开资料的AI推演,不声称代表任何真实人物的立场。 未经授权,不得将本系统输出内容用于公开传播或声称代表真实人物观点。 本系统生成的内容如有任何法律风险,均由使用者自行承担。 预蒸馏角色池:AI技术界×9位,酒店行业×11位,风投×12位,共32位 支持实时蒸馏新角色,支持无背景时交互式引导 触发词:模拟讨论,大佬辩论,思想领袖论坛,大佬意见,大佬参会,行业峰会模拟

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Chaoliuzhu v3.0.0 MIT-0 37 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 573 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: thought-leader-forum (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 37. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 24 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1573 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 336: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 31 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
  • +4Has examples (17 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a disclosed persona-simulation and discussion aid with some scoping/privacy cautions, but no evidence of hidden access, exfiltration, destructive behavior, or persistence.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026