SKILLEMALL.ai

AC env-config-validator

Validate .env files against schemas, compare environments (dev vs prod), detect common mistakes (trailing spaces, placeholders, invalid ports, missing protocols, duplicate keys, unquoted spaces), auto-generate schemas, and type-check values. Supports text, JSON, and markdown output with CI-friendly exit codes. Use when asked to validate environment config, check .env files for errors, compare env files, diff environments, detect env misconfigurations, generate env schema, audit .env variables, check for missing env vars, or ensure env consistency across environments. Triggers on "validate env", "check .env", "compare environments", "env diff", "env schema", "env audit", "missing env vars", "environment config".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: charlie-morrison v1.0.1 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 677 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, running it twice

AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 10 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 677 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 8 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 720: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a local .env validation tool, but its schema and report workflows can persist real secrets into files users may commit or share.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026