SKILLEMALL.ai

AC git-release-notes

Generate polished release notes and changelogs from git history. Analyzes commits between tags/refs, categorizes changes (features, fixes, breaking changes, etc.), and produces formatted release notes in multiple styles. Use when asked to generate release notes, create a changelog, summarize changes between versions, write release documentation, or prepare a GitHub release. Triggers on "release notes", "changelog", "what changed since", "summarize commits", "version bump notes", "prepare release".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: charlie-morrison v1.0.1 MIT-0 5 files · 1 script body ≈ 833 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorGitHubWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 13 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, git) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 833 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 502: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This release-notes skill is mostly coherent, but its helper script can run unintended local code if used on a repository with maliciously named refs.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026