SKILLEMALL.ai

BB trivy-security-scanner

Run Trivy vulnerability scans on containers, filesystems, and IaC — then triage findings by exploitability, reachability, and business impact with AI-powered prioritization.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: charlie-morrison v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 610 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureInfrastructureSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
72/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege SKILL.md:23
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
    wget -qO - https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy-repo/deb/public.key | gpg --dearmor | sudo tee /usr/share/keyrings/trivy.gpg > /dev/null
    security skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege SKILL.md:24
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
    echo "deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/trivy.gpg] https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy-repo/deb $(lsb_release -sc) main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/trivy.list
    security skill

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100

  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 32 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2610 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 173: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a transparent Trivy vulnerability-scanning guide, with expected but privacy-relevant scanning and enrichment behavior users should scope carefully.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026