SKILLEMALL.ai

AB llm-benchmark-analyst

search and analyze llm benchmark results within a fixed benchmark universe, then produce evidence-based model strength and weakness reports or domain-leader summaries. use when comparing a model across benchmarks, ranking the best models by domain, explaining what a benchmark measures, checking predecessor-vs-current progress, or writing benchmark reports that must prioritize exact model version, evaluation date, benchmark variant, score semantics, sub-scores, and benchmark defect warnings. works with browser, web, and multimodal extraction for text, table, canvas, or image-only leaderboards.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 水母打结 v1.0.0 MIT-0 9 files body ≈ 1 735 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticsAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
72/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
50
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
    • 85Steps. 79 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1735 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 599: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 79 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is an instruction-only benchmark research skill that asks the agent to browse public benchmark sources and produce cited reports, with no code execution, credential use, persistence, or hidden data handling found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026