SKILLEMALL.ai

BC spontaneous-trip-planner

使用飞猪旅行工具生成个性化旅行计划。当用户提到旅行、游玩、景点、规划行程时自动触发。触发后必须先与用户确认:1) 出发地 2) 旅行场景 3) 出行人数 4) 旅行三要素选两个(价格实惠/时间充裕/景点品质),确认后结合当前季节,使用 flyai 工具生成定制化方案

ClawHub Agent Skills author: chenshinan v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 847 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "type"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 72 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1847 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • medium 7 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
  • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 133: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 72 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The skill appears to collect travel-planning preferences for itinerary help, with usability concerns but no evidence of hidden, destructive, or credential-seeking behavior.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026