SKILLEMALL.ai

BF prompt-alchemist

蒸馏四位顶级提示词工程师(Riley Goodside、涂津豪/推广CO-STAR、Sander Schulhoff、李继刚)的方法论,融合为"四元蒸馏框架",自动优化用户提示词,提升AI回答质量。 ## 激活方式 - "帮我优化提示词""改进我的Prompt""让AI回答更好" - "提示词蒸馏""prompt alchemist""帮我看看这个提示词" - 直接粘贴提示词文本(无需指令,自动进入优化流程) ## 输出特色 - 三级输出:简单任务只输出诊断+成品,复杂任务完整五段 - 原始质量评级:直观展示优化前后对比锚点 - 操作清单化:压缩步骤从"原则"改为"可执行操作表格" - 反模式防御:内置常见错误对照,防止过度优化

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Cherish133 v0.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 840 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

蒸馏四位顶级提示词工程师(Riley Goodside、涂津豪/推广CO-STAR、Sander Schulhoff、李继刚)的方法论,融合为"四元蒸馏框架",自动优化用户提示词,提升AI回答质量。 激活方式 - "帮我优化提示词""改进我的Prompt""让AI回答更好" - "提示词蒸馏""prompt…

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/examples.md

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/examples.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/examples.md
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "read_when"

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/examples.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/examples.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 67 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1840 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low The response is described with custom markup (18 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -273 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 320: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 67 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a prompt-improvement skill with broad but disclosed activation wording and no evidence of tool use, credential access, persistence, or data exfiltration.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 25 Jun 2026