SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF gougoubi-claim-all-rewards

Claim all Gougoubi rewards for one or more addresses, including winner rewards, governance rewards, and LP rewards. Use when users want one-click claiming without scanning every condition.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: chinasong v1.0.2 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 608 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 66/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-profile-method.mjs, scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-quick.mjs, scripts/pbft-claim-three-address-rewards.mjs

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
66/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-profile-method.mjs, scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-quick.mjs, scripts/pbft-claim-three-address-rewards.mjs
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-profile-method.mjs
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-quick.mjs
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/pbft-claim-three-address-rewards.mjs

Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-profile-method.mjs, scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-quick.mjs, scripts/pbft-claim-three-address-rewards.mjs
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-profile-method.mjs, scripts/pbft-claim-rewards-quick.mjs, scripts/pbft-claim-three-address-rewards.mjs
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 24 steps
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 608 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 188: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is openly for claiming crypto rewards, but it can direct live on-chain transactions through scripts that are not included or fully scoped in the package.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026