BC bounty-hunter
Automated smart contract bug bounty hunting. Scans Immunefi/Code4rena targets with Slither static analysis, triages findings with local LLMs, and generates PoC templates. Zero API cost for scanning phase.
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
AnalyzerAI and agentsSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:2Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Automated smart contract bug bounty hunting that scans Immunefi and Code4rena targets with Slither static analysis, triages findings with local LLMs, and prepares PoC investigation workflows. <br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:3Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)description: Automated smart contract bug bounty hunting. Scans Immunefi/Code4rena targets with Slither static analysis, triages findings with local LLMs, and generates PoC templates. Zero API cost fo
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:9Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)Automated smart contract vulnerability scanner for bug bounty programs. Uses free tools (Slither + local LLMs) for the heavy lifting, saves expensive models for PoC writing.
detector
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (bounty-hunter) differs from the folder (angus-bounty-hunter)
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 419 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 204: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This smart-contract scanner mostly matches its purpose, but it can install and run code from untrusted target repositories on the user's machine.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026