AB errand-ai
Send a real person to a physical place in Seoul (Gangnam area) to check, photograph, verify, queue, or pick something up, and get GPS+photo evidence back. Use when the user needs eyes or hands on site — "is this store open?", "how long is the line?", "take a photo of the menu", "is the product on the shelf?".
As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:81Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s https://errand.be/api/v1/capabilities -H "Authorization: Bearer $ERRANDAI_API_KEY"
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:125Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s https://errand.be/api/v1/dispatches/$DISPATCH_ID -H "Authorization: Bearer $ERRANDAI_API_KEY"
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:136Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s https://errand.be/api/v1/dispatches/$DISPATCH_ID/result -H "Authorization: Bearer $ERRANDAI_API_KEY"
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:161Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s -X POST https://errand.be/api/v1/dispatches/$DISPATCH_ID/cancel -H "Authorization: Bearer $ERRANDAI_API_KEY"
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:168Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s https://errand.be/api/v1/dispatches -H "Authorization: Bearer $ERRANDAI_API_KEY"
vendor-host
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 14 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2434 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 310: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.