AC preview-scorecard
Create a shareable RooQuiz preview scorecard — a scored questionnaire where each option adds points toward a total that buckets into levels — and get a link to open in the browser. No account, login, or API key required. Use this when someone wants to build, try out, or share a self-assessment, health/habit score, readiness or maturity check, satisfaction survey, or any rated questionnaire that turns answers into a total score and a level (no "correct" answer). For a right/wrong graded quiz, use the preview-quiz skill; for a personality/type test with no scores, use the preview-outcome skill.
Create a shareable RooQuiz preview scorecard — a scored questionnaire where each option adds points toward a total that buckets into levels — and get a link…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 22 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4257 tokens
- 100Steps. 22 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 599: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.