SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB honeybook

This skill should be used when the user asks about HoneyBook client-portal data. Triggers on phrases like "check HoneyBook", "sign contract", "pay invoice", "HoneyBook vendors", "unsigned contracts", "open invoices", "message the planner", "reply to my vendor", "next meeting with the planner", or any request involving wedding-vendor contracts, invoices, brochures, proposals, payments, messages, meetings or tasks via HoneyBook.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: chrischall v0.10.3 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 082 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ReferenceFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 44 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2082 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 430: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is mostly coherent for HoneyBook portal access, but it exposes raw modes that can reveal vendor-side data beyond a normal client task.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 10 Sept 2026