SKILLEMALL.ai

AB opentable

Manage OpenTable reservations via MCP — search restaurants, check slot availability, book tables, list/cancel reservations, and manage favorites. Triggers on phrases like "book a table on OpenTable", "find me a reservation at", "what OpenTable reservations do I have", "cancel my OpenTable", "add to my OpenTable favorites", "what's available for dinner tonight at", or any request involving OpenTable restaurant reservations. Requires opentable-mcp installed and the fetchproxy browser extension running in a signed-in opentable.com tab.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: chrischall v0.19.3 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 3 525 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 13 h ago

Manage OpenTable reservations via MCP — search restaurants, check slot availability, book tables, list/cancel reservations, and manage favorites.

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
  • 85Steps. 20 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3525 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 538: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This OpenTable skill is coherent for restaurant reservations, but it asks users to run unpinned external code and a shared browser extension through a signed-in OpenTable session.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Sept 2026